SNAP Benefits Update – States Crack Down on Processed Foods and Eligibility Rules

Changes are coming to grocery store trips for millions of Americans who rely on SNAP benefits. Starting in 2026, nearly 20 states will begin restricting the kinds of foods that can be purchased with the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. At the top of the banned list? Processed items like soda, candy, and sugary snacks.

These new limits reflect a growing push by states to promote healthier eating and take more control over how federal food aid is used. But it’s not just about food choices. Work requirements and eligibility rules are also getting stricter, and a legal battle is already brewing over data privacy and state-federal power struggles.

Here’s what you need to know about the shifting SNAP landscape.

Processed

The biggest headline-grabber is the crackdown on processed foods. Several states are moving forward with USDA waivers that allow them to block certain purchases under SNAP. That means items like soda, candy bars, and sugary cereals could be off-limits for recipients.

Florida will lead the way, with its waiver set to take effect on January 1. Other states approved for similar programs include Texas, Oklahoma, Indiana, and South Carolina. More states are expected to follow as the USDA opens the door to these kinds of restrictions.

According to Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins, the goal is to protect children and vulnerable populations from unhealthy food habits. Critics argue it’s a slippery slope toward government overreach.

States

Here’s a quick look at some states where SNAP food restrictions are happening:

State	Waiver Status	Effective Date
Florida	Approved	Jan 1, 2026
Texas	Approved	TBD
Oklahoma	Approved	TBD
Indiana	Approved	TBD
South Carolina	Approved	TBD

More than a dozen additional states are in talks with the USDA, suggesting this trend is gaining momentum.

Work

While food restrictions get attention, another change with big consequences is the return of work requirements. Under the Trump administration, work rules for able-bodied adults without dependents (ABAWDs) are being enforced more strictly.

In states like Oregon, those who don’t meet the 20-hour work or training requirement can only receive SNAP for three months in a 36-month period. New York has long enforced these rules, and other states are now being pulled into the national policy.

These changes are expected to reduce the number of recipients in several states—particularly adults under 50 who don’t have children.

Eligibility

The federal government is also pushing for tighter eligibility rules and more aggressive oversight. One of the most controversial elements? Requests for more detailed data on SNAP recipients, including their immigration status.

This demand has led to a serious backlash in several states. Kansas Gov. Laura Kelly said she’s caught between protecting personal privacy and ensuring people don’t go hungry. Her state, along with others, is now challenging these new demands in court.

The fear is that more people may lose access to food aid if they don’t meet the new eligibility or reporting requirements.

Legal

In Minnesota, tensions have escalated into a legal showdown. The USDA is demanding that Gov. Tim Walz recertify SNAP recipients in certain counties. This follows his outspoken criticism of federal immigration policy and recent raids in the state.

A federal judge recently gave states more time to comply with the new data-sharing demands, pushing the deadline to April 9. But the conflict is far from over, and legal experts expect more court challenges ahead.

Key SNAP Policy Changes

Category	Change	Impact
Food Purchases	Ban on soda, candy, processed foods	Starts in 2026 in some states
Income Rules	Stricter eligibility checks	May disqualify some households
Work Rules	3-month limit for non-working ABAWDs	Enforced nationwide
Privacy Rules	USDA demands immigration data	Legal challenges pending
Timeline	Most rules take effect in 2026	Some already underway

Impact

For families who rely on SNAP to make ends meet, these new changes could mean a major shift in both budgeting and nutrition. While healthier food might seem like a worthy goal, opponents argue that limiting choice treats low-income Americans unfairly and adds more red tape to an already complex program.

As more states apply for waivers and the federal government ramps up oversight, SNAP is entering a new era. Whether it’s an improvement or a setback depends on who you ask.

Either way, recipients, advocates, and policymakers will need to stay informed as these changes roll out across the country.

FAQs